OKRs: Why Do Teams Lean Toward Outputs — and Why Should They Embrace Outcomes?

When setting OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), many teams naturally gravitate toward outputs. It’s understandable:
  • Outputs are easier to control and predict. Outputs provide tangible steps that teams can complete, offering a sense of progress.
  • It’s clear how to achieve them. Teams can plan delivery milestones, making them feel productive and in control.
  • They can be tracked in the short term with less complexity. Immediate results like features shipped or projects delivered give teams quick wins.

However, focusing on outputs can come at a cost. Teams risk becoming a “feature factory”—prioritising quantity over value. Instead of driving impactful change, they end up optimising delivery timelines and losing sight of what truly matters: outcomes.

Why Should Teams Focus on Outcomes?

While outputs have their place, outcomes—the actual results and value created—often deliver greater impact. Here’s why:

  • Outcomes enable value-driven comparisons and data tracking. Measuring the results of your work helps assess whether you’re creating value, not just completing tasks. For example, shipping a feature (output) is great, but increasing customer satisfaction or retention (outcome) proves its worth.
  • Outcomes drive learning for the team and the organisation. When teams shift their focus to outcomes, they move beyond activity-based thinking. They start asking critical questions: Did this initiative solve the problem? Did it improve the metric we care about?
  • Outcomes provide clearer, narrower focus. Outputs can scatter a team’s efforts across too many priorities, while outcomes align everyone around what matters most—achieving the objective.

The Pitfalls of an Output-Driven Approach

Teams often default to outputs because they’re easier to manage. But this focus can lead to several challenges:

  • Short-term thinking: Delivering outputs quickly might seem effective, but it doesn’t guarantee long-term value.
  • Misaligned priorities: Teams might deliver features that don’t contribute to strategic goals.
  • Lack of impact: Without measuring outcomes, it’s hard to understand if your efforts are making a difference.

Outputs vs Outcomes: Striking the Balance

Outputs are milestones—necessary steps toward achieving your objectives. But outcomes are the ultimate destination. To strike the right balance:

  1. Define success in terms of outcomes: Identify the change you want to see, not just the actions you’ll take.
  2. Use outputs as stepping stones: Outputs should help you achieve outcomes, but they shouldn’t be the end goal.
  3. Prioritise by value: Focus on initiatives that deliver measurable outcomes aligned with your objectives.

Transforming Teams with Outcome-Driven OKRs

Making the shift from outputs to outcomes requires a mindset change. Teams must:

  • Adopt a product-led approach: Prioritise customer value and continuous improvement over pure delivery.
  • Focus on “time to money” instead of “time to market”: Ensure every deliverable contributes to the organisation’s success.
  • Track and learn from results: Measure outcomes consistently to understand what works and iterate accordingly.
By concentrating on outcomes, teams align their efforts with organisational goals, delivering value that matters. Remember: Outputs are what you do; outcomes are why you do it. Shifting your focus ensures your work drives impact, not just activity.
Download the Outputs vs Outcomes